Sri Lanka – dealing with the legacy of a brutal war

Now that the fighting in Sri Lanka is over, attention must focus on reconciliation

This piece was first published in The Independent on 20 May 2009.

The final weeks of the civil war in Sri Lanka were marked by serious
and credible allegations of war crimes on both sides. Now that the fighting is
over, international attention is shifting to the need to promote reconciliation
and bring some accounting for brutality against civilians.

The European Union has called for an independent investigation into any
violations of the laws of war, and said that those responsible must be brought
to justice.

The Sri Lankan government’s first priority must be to attend to the wounded.
It is a central tenet of the laws of war that the wounded and sick should be
cared for, and this responsibility appears to have been utterly neglected by
both sides in the final weeks of the conflict. At the same time, the huge
numbers of displaced people must be provided for and treated humanely, with no
reprisals against anyone suspected of having helped the rebels or defied the
government’s ban on reporting information from the war zone.

The laws of war also require that governments investigate reports of war
crimes by their forces. The intensive shelling of the Tamil Tigers’ enclave may
have violated rules prohibiting disproportionate harm to civilians (though such
charges can be hard to prove conclusively) and there are suggestions that the
army may have deliberately targeted hospitals.

On the rebels’ side, there is substantial evidence that civilians were used
as human shields, violating a well-established rule of international
humanitarian law. The government should allow independent human rights
investigators immediate access to the area, to provide a check on the official
account. The Sri Lankan government ought by rights to prosecute any army
officers who committed violations, and it could also try any captured rebels
against whom there is evidence of such crimes.

If the government fails to enforce accountability, the international
community might step in – but the International Criminal Court would only have
jurisdiction over Sri Lanka,
which is not party to the court, if the UN Security Council refers the
situation to it.

Ultimately, the outside world may have to decide whether its first concern
is with promoting a political settlement or justice – if the Sri Lankan
government makes a genuine effort to address Tamil concerns, there will be less
international pressure for any war crimes trials to be held.

The author is executive director of the Crimes of War Project and a senior
policy fellow with the European Council on Foreign Relations

The European Council on Foreign Relations does not take collective positions. ECFR publications only represent the views of their individual authors.


Senior Policy Fellow

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

We will store your email address and gather analytics on how you interact with our mailings. You can unsubscribe or opt-out at any time. Find out more in our privacy notice.