The European Council on Foreign Relations

Western Balkans: The way out of the EU?s waiting room

By Daniel Korski - 26 May 10

Ten years is a long time to wait for an appointment -- especially one you may never get. But that is the time that the countries of the Western Balkans have sat in the EU's waiting-room. Unlike a client or a patient who knows that their appointment will eventually come, however, these states are asked to undertake difficult and ambitious reforms to prepare them for EU membership, without the certainty of ever being let into the club.

As a result doubts have been sown about the genuine nature of the EU's commitment to the region's European integration. This is having a direct impact on the bloc's ability to promote reforms. For without external pressure and incentives, leaders like Sali Berisha in Albania, Milorad Dodik in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Nikola Gruevski in Macedonia and Milo Djukanovic in Montenegro tend to lose their eagerness for administrative reform.

The challenge for the EU now is how to get back to a point where it is incentivising progress as it did until recently, rather than creating disillusionment and the possibility of regression. In other words, it is not a question of going slow or going fast; it is about moving in the right direction.  The planned Sarajevo Summit on 2 June is an opportunity to articulate a re-launched EU strategy.

In a new ECFR briefing, Heather Grabbe, Gerald Knaus and I recommend that the EU announce at the summit that it intends to begin "screening" six of the region's countries - Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Serbia and Montenegro - within the next year, and promise a similar process for Kosovo. Furthermore, in order to promote the kind of regional competition that worked for the recent process of visa liberalisation, the countries should begin the process of screening together, rather than each doing a separate exercise after starting negotiations, as has happened in the past.

These are difficult times for the Western Balkans. The economic crisis in Greece and in other EU member states is hurting the already weak economies of the region and deepening the mood of uncertainty. Doubts about the future of the European project in the wake of the euro crisis could push voters away from pro-European reformers, and towards nationalist and fringe politicians. Because of this, keeping the Balkan countries in the EU waiting-room indefinitely carries increasing risks.

However, mobilising interest in the Balkans within the EU at such a moment is also unrealistic. The best way forward is to use tools that the EU already has at its disposal, but to use them more fully and effectively.  Those recent experiences with visa liberalisation show that the EU still has the power to motivate serious reforms in weak states by mobilising the right incentives. We now know what this requires: clear and objective conditions; close engagement at a technical level by Commission and member state experts; a clear timetable of opportunities; and transparent assessments that trigger positive competition between neighbouring countries.

Those same mechanisms that worked for visa liberalisation can be used to motivate serious reform in the Balkans. By the summer of 2011, screening should start for all countries of the region. The aim should be that by the end of Poland's first EU Presidency in the second half of 2011, all the countries will have completed screening and achieved candidate status. This is not about making concessions; it is about putting in place a rigorous but fair process that encourages Balkan countries to identify their shortcomings and devise plans to overcome them.

For more...

Download the full text of "Beyond wait-and-see: the way forward for EU Balkan policy" here.

Listen to an audio podcast with Heather Grabbe on this paper here.

Click here for our press release for the policy brief.


3 Comments

#1

For a country to wait in the anteroom of adhesion for the EU becomes unbearable. Other countries, as Spain, had also a long period of negotiations.

Nevertheless, nowadays the EU is in a period in which the “idea of Europe” has been stopped due to an excessively voluminous and not totally well prepared enlargement.

The problems that the EU suffers in economic level and its economic fragility it is due to UE has multiplied almost by two the members.

The EU must look for ways to accompany in the waiting period to these countries (special status, treaties of a special preference, etc) But also he has to be realistic and tell the truth: during a time it will be very difficult that these countries get to be members of the EU.

Juan Antonio Falc?n Blasco

Juan Antonio Falcon Blasco | Zaragoza - Spain | 24 Jun 10, 24 Jun 10 EST
#2

NOT IN MY NAME

This whole article hangs on the premise that any country that applies to join the EU - however bloodthirsty, violent, sectarian or anti-democratic its previous culture will – eventually – be admitted.

Who promised this?  Who agreed to this?  On behalf of how many European citizens?

It is quite clear to me and many others that some countries and cultures are fundamentally incompatible with ‘European’ values.  Those should be told, politely but firmly, that there is no prospect of their being invited to join in any foreseeable future. 

In particular: Serbia. 

Have the Eurocrats forgotten the recent history: from Knin, though Vukovar, Osijek, Dubrovnik, Mostar, Sarajevo, Omarska, Jasenovac, Mitrovica, Stajicevo, Begejci, Nis, Srebrenica, Prekaz, or Rogove?  Four wars of aggression; ten years of genocide, ethnic cleansing, violence, rape, murder, torture and starvation.

And not just Milosevic and the leadership.  I was watching the reports during all those ten years.  Not ONCE did any single Serb interviewed - from Milosevic down to ordinary ‘vox pop’ interviewees on the streets - apologise, express shame or remorse, or do anything other than complain that they [the Serbs] were being ‘victimised’.  Every single person showed the same national paranoia.

If the EU has any moral values [something we have serious doubts about], it should make clear once and for all that Serbia is a pariah culture, excluded from the European comity of nations at least until an adequate period – a century or three – of demonstrated civilised behaviour.

Chris Tregenna | London | 11 Feb 11, 11 Feb 11 EST
#3

How very strange . . .

I left a strong comment on the ‘presumption’ that all these countries should - and in due course would - be invited to join the EU.

The comment hasn’t been posted.  But the reference to the inevitability of their joining has disappeared from the original text.

Does anyone smell the whiff of censorship?

Chris Tregenna | London | 13 Feb 11, 13 Feb 11 EST

Submit a Comment

Your message will be submitted to a moderator before appearing online. Name and email address are required, all other fields are optional. Your email will not be displayed.

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Remember my personal information

Latest Publications

The EU and Azerbaijan: Beyond Oil

How Europe can promote democracy in Azerbaijan

How France and Germany can make Europe work

Hollande and Merkel should launch an ambitious EU reform programme

China and Germany: a new special relationship?

Why the emerging special relationship matters for Europe

China Analysis: Taiwan after the election

How will Taiwan’s relationship with China evolve? 

Jordan: Reform before it’s too late

Europe should take a more assertive approach to political reform in Jordan

China at the crossroads: are the reformers winning the argument?

China is facing a choice between regress and reform

How the EU can support reform in Burma

Europe can help Burma reform, but its help must be gradual

Syria: Towards a Political Solution

An end to the bloodshed may necessitate talks with the regime

The end of the Putin consensus

Putin's return: why Europe should prepare for a weaker Putin

The long shadow of ordoliberalism: Germany's approach to the euro crisis

The thinking behind Germany's unpopular approach to the crisis

European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2012

How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?

Reinvention of Europe

In the Press

Presseurop
22 May 12

ECFR's policy brief on China and Germany is discussed

Le Monde
21 May 12

ECFR's policy brief on China and Germany quoted

The Moscow News
21 May 12

Nick Witney quoted on NATO Chicago Summit and missile shield

Le Progrès
20 May 12

Nick Witney quoted on NATO Chicago Summit

Read more press >

Publications side bar