Higher Turnout May not be Enough to Save Tymoshenko
So the voting at least is over. The polls in Ukraine closed at 8 pm Kiev time, 6 pm in London, 7 pm CET. The exit polls came fast. Surprisingly, the first to be quoted was the ‘National Exit Poll' which was drastically wrong in round one. It puts Yanukovych on 48.7%, Tymoshenko on 45.5% and ‘Against All' at 5.5%. Five other exit polls had a similar message: all put Yanukovych ahead by 3-6%; none put Tymoshenko ahead and none put the gap under 3%. But all put the number ‘against all' between 5% and 6%. Which means the abstainers decided the election; Tymoshenko could have closed the gap with their votes.
Turnout is reported to be up on the first round, maybe over 70%. This might still help Tymoshenko as the real votes are counted; but she really needs turnout to be exceptionally high in the west and centre.
Time will only tell whether this is the worst of all possible results. The real count will take until late tomorrow at least. There is a world of difference between a gap of 5% or 6% and one of less than 3%. Every vote will count. But if the exit polls are right, not because the count will determine who wins; Yanukovych is ahead. But the overnight count will determine whether protest at the result will have a plausible narrative or not. As will the drip feed of stories of voter infringement. This election was conducted with vastly higher standards in round one. Round two was never going to be perfect. Every incident will now be a news story. Judging its true import is still vitally important.
Yanukovych Tymoshenko Against all
National exit poll 48.7% 45.5% 5.5%
Inter/SOCIS 49.6% 44.5% 5.9%
ICTV 49.8% 44.5% 5.9%
Shuster Studio 48.7% 45.6% 5.7%
R&B (not the music) 50.3% 44% 5.5%
Inter/FOM/USS 49.7% 44.6% 5.6%
I'll be back with more analysis on Monday, when we know a little bit more about what the final figures mean. As I've said in previous blogs, whoever looks like slipping behind is unlikely to take any defeat lying down...
Read Andrew's previous blog post on why the loser might bring people onto the streets
Listen to his special podcast interview with two eminent Ukrainians, Olexiy Haran and Mykola Ryabchuk, here
For the press...Andrew is available for interviews. Click here for our press advisory.
|
|
Tweet |
How Europe can promote democracy in Azerbaijan
Hollande and Merkel should launch an ambitious EU reform programme
Why the emerging special relationship matters for Europe
How will Taiwan’s relationship with China evolve?
Europe should take a more assertive approach to political reform in Jordan
China is facing a choice between regress and reform
Europe can help Burma reform, but its help must be gradual
An end to the bloodshed may necessitate talks with the regime
Putin's return: why Europe should prepare for a weaker Putin
The thinking behind Germany's unpopular approach to the crisis
How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?
ECFR's policy brief on China and Germany is discussed
Nicholas Walton is quoted in an article about the trial of General Mladic
ECFR's policy brief on China and Germany quoted
Nick Witney quoted on NATO Chicago Summit and missile shield
Comments
There are no comments for this entry yet. Get the discussion started and post below.