This piece first appeared in the Financial Times
On May 9, when European Union leaders approved the rescue package embodied in the European financial stability facility, Spain saw the light at the end of the tunnel. Six months later, it is looking like it belongs to an incoming train. Seeing how the story unfolded in Greece and Ireland and watching the crisis heading for Portugal, it is no wonder that the dominant sentiment in Spain is concern. But more than that, the prevailing feeling is one of frustration with Germany.
With the May agreement in its pocket, the Spanish government went home and put together a reform package that had everything required to get Spain out of its collision course: government expenditure reductions, labour market reforms, public sector pay cuts, pension freezes, an extension of the retirement age and a rise in value added tax. Subsequently, the government, with the aid of the central bank, decided to rein in regional and local government deficits, forced regional saving banks to merge and made public its bank stress tests. Most of the measures are now in place. Spain's current problems start not at home but rather abroad – in Germany, to be precise.
In the past, Germany has been both a model and a partner for Spain. In its transition to democracy, Madrid adapted and adopted German institutions such as the Länder power-sharing arrangements and the principles of a social market economy. Even in foreign policy, Spain tried to mirror Germany's wise combination of Atlanticism and firm support for European integration. In the 1980s Felipe González supported the deployment of cruise and Pershing missiles, while Helmut Kohl supported Spain's accession to the European Community.
Thanks to the vision of González, who supported German reunification when Margaret Thatcher, François Mitterrand and Giulio Andreotti were fiercely opposing it, Spain and Germany developed a true strategic relationship. But, starting in the late 1990s with José María Aznar and Gerhard Schröder, the bilateral relationship began to cool; then José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero and Angela Merkel let it die. Now, sadly, Ms Merkel's decisions are damaging Spain, turning Germany into a rival.
Max Weber famously made the distinction between an ethics of conviction and an ethics of responsibility. In the former, typical of science or religion, all that counts is being right; in the latter, more common to politics, it is the consequences of one's actions that matter. This antithesis perfectly captures the current debate about a permanent crisis resolution mechanism for the eurozone. In an ideal world, Ms Merkel's proposal to have investors, and not only citizens, suffer the consequences of their investment decisions is both fair and rational. Yet, as we are seeing, there is a good chance that in real life the eurozone could be killed precisely by this proposal to make it work better. This would be no small irony. But it highlights the extent to which religious zeal has replaced political vision in Germany. As the saying goes: fiat iustitia, pereat mundus (let there be justice, though the world perish).
Even more problematic is that such German recklessness points to deep-seated changes in how Berlin views southern Europe. During the 1980s and 1990s, the European integration process resulted in a virtuous circle of growth: the periphery grew faster than the centre, significantly catching up in terms of average per capita wealth; but Germany and others benefited substantially, because that growth was based on their exports and foreign direct investment. This seems to be irreversibly broken now. Germany is looking to Russia and to China as the markets for its exports, but rather than placing its bilateral relations with Moscow and Beijing at the service of the EU as a whole, it seems that it is going solo.
Seen from Spain, it is as if Germany had decided southern Europe was a burden that prevents it from going global and needs to be dumped. True, Spain is at the European periphery, but Europe itself is bound to be increasingly the periphery of Asia. Therefore, this Alleingang (going solo) policy can hardly work. In a century dominated by Asia, no European country will be able to make it on its own. A weaker Europe, especially if the eurozone breaks down, will mean a weaker Germany. This is not only about Spain or southern Europe's survival, but about Europe's as a whole.
This article has been widely quoted since its publication in the Financial Times, including by Martin Wolf and others in the same publication, as well as in the Economist, EU Business, Terra Argentina, Agence France-Press (published for example on The Local).
|
|
Tweet |
Hollande and Merkel should launch an ambitious EU reform programme
Why the emerging special relationship matters for Europe
How will Taiwan’s relationship with China evolve?
Europe should take a more assertive approach to political reform in Jordan
China is facing a choice between regress and reform
Europe can help Burma reform, but its help must be gradual
An end to the bloodshed may necessitate talks with the regime
Putin's return: why Europe should prepare for a weaker Putin
The thinking behind Germany's unpopular approach to the crisis
How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?
From a major exporter of goods to a major exporter of capital
Sebastian Dullien's article on the myths surrounding a Greek € exit is mentioned in the…
Silvia Francescon quoted on G20 significance for Polish daily
Thomas Klau quoted on Hollande's visit to Berlin
Le Monde quotes ECFR's Policy Brief on China and Germany new special relationship
6 Comments
A statement like this :“This
antithesis perfectly captures the current debate about a permanent crisis resolution mechanism
for the eurozone. In an ideal world, Ms Merkel?s proposal to have investors, and not only
citizens, suffer the consequences of their investment decisions is both fair and rational. Yet, as
we are seeing, there is a good chance that in real life the eurozone could be killed precisely by
this proposal to make it work better.”
Needs to be justify with data and with arguments.
If Germany grows even going “solo” is better for Spain because our economy depends a lot in the exports to Germany and the comsumption of the german tourist.
It is by no means clear that a Germany outside of the Euro would mean a weaker Germany. Guilt for World War II cannot be visited on the second and third generations, and as such Germans are probably a little bit tired and fed up of continually subsidising the life styles of some peripheral European countries.
very interesting article indeed, and shows that the solution is not to copy one country but to contribute to a sound european approach. Europe dies from this, both intergovernmental Spain and Germany, among 25 others, opened the way to the failure of the intergovernmental Europe. failed Maastricht, failed Lisabon agenda, failed crisis management. fantastic result…
Here the big mistake of Germany is to think that the signature of a state is the same as the one of a corporate. We cannot allow our states to default. But we can allow them to restructure their debt without any haircut for the investors. Big mistake indeed. Please look at my last post on www.europelibre.typepad.com.
“Spain’s current problems start not at home but rather abroad”
This statement/article is so typical of Spanish Socialists like Torreblanca. Blame others (Germany, Morocco, USA, Latin Americans, Merkel, Bush, neocons, Zionists, Jewish lobbies, etc etc etc) instead of accepting responsibility for Spain’s own self-inflicted mistakes.
As everyone knows (except Torreblanca, evidently), Spain’s problems stem from uncontrolled greed that over the course of a decade created and then burst a housing bubble. The housing bubble was not caused by Germany, rather by greedy Spaniards who wanted to live beyond their means, all on credit they now cannot repay.
“With the May agreement in its pocket, the Spanish government went home and put together a reform package that had everything required to get Spain out of its collision course”
This is simply untrue. Zapatero’s promised reforms are only half complete. He stopped implementing the most important reforms because of opposition from the Labour Unions and also sinking poll numbers. Consider crucial pension reforms, which have been postponed indefinitely. International investors (as well as many Spaniards) have legitimate doubts about Zapatero’s economic management, and this is not Germany’s fault.
“Max Weber famously made the distinction between an ethics of conviction and an ethics of responsibility.” “fiat iustitia, pereat mundus”
This sort of writing style is also typical of Spanish Socialists, the pro-government El Pais newspaper is completely full of it. The use of faux sophistication to obfuscate the simplicity of the problem at hand: Spain got itself into the mess it is in because of its own irresponsibility, not because ?all that counts is (Merkel) being right?
Articles like this one seriously undermine the credibility of the European Council on Foreign Relations.
Some peripheral countries like Spain and Ireland did not put brakes on the property boom although the development was very obvious for a long period so to blame Germany is a bit far fetched. Now the author blames Mrs Merkel for the statement that private investors must bear the burden of stupid investments, i.e. also German banks. It is clear that there must be a European mechanism to handle insolvensies in the financial industry. We can not just transfer private debt into public debt en masse ad hoc. So that is what must be discussed not to blame Germany for being an infidel European.
Germany’s export economy would be ruined without the relative weakness of the euro compared to a strengthened DM.