Another Election Fix?
Ukraine's boorish MPs have always liked agood fight in parliament, but on Wednesday they had good cause, whenYanukovych's supporters succeeded in changing the election law only four daysbefore the final vote. Changing the rules in the middle of the game is ofcourse a major scandal, and Ukrainehad been specifically warned against doing so by the OSCE and the VeniceCommission (which makes recommendations on constitutional law to members of theCouncil of Europe).
Parliamentmade three key changes. The provision for election committees to make consensualdecisions via a 2/3rds quorum was abolished - increasing the risk of partisanbias. Any vacancies can now be filled by local authorities, which are alsooften highly partisan in the different regions of Ukraine. In the east they arecontrolled by Yanukovych's supporters, in the centre by Tymoshenko's. Higherlevel commissions have greater powers to intervene in the decisions of lowercommissions.
The changesdo not make fraud inevitable, but they weaken the insurance mechanisms that aredesigned to stop it.
Tymoshenkohas cried foul, lobbying G8 ambassadors, the OSCE and the internationalcommunity at large to protest. She has talked of a new Orange Revolution ifPresident Yushchenko signs the law. She is perfectly entitled to protest,though she is also trying to mobilise her own supporters - and has been lookingfor something to complain about. Yushchenko signed the law with vulgaralacrity.
Twenty ninemembers of his Our Ukraine block voted for the bill on Wednesday, increasingthe possibility that they could defect to Yanukovych if he wins the presidency.This places the existing precarious parliamentary majority that backsTymoshenko as prime minister under threat.
Yanukovych'ssupporters meanwhile have reminded the world that they have never come to termswith, or even admitted, what they did in 2004.
Read Andrew's first blog post on Tymoshenko
For the press...Andrew is available for interviews. Click here for our press advisory.
|
|
Tweet |
How Europe can promote democracy in Azerbaijan
Hollande and Merkel should launch an ambitious EU reform programme
Why the emerging special relationship matters for Europe
How will Taiwan’s relationship with China evolve?
Europe should take a more assertive approach to political reform in Jordan
China is facing a choice between regress and reform
Europe can help Burma reform, but its help must be gradual
An end to the bloodshed may necessitate talks with the regime
Putin's return: why Europe should prepare for a weaker Putin
The thinking behind Germany's unpopular approach to the crisis
How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?
ECFR's policy brief on China and Germany is discussed
Nicholas Walton is quoted in an article about the trial of General Mladic
ECFR's policy brief on China and Germany quoted
Nick Witney quoted on NATO Chicago Summit and missile shield
Comments
There are no comments for this entry yet. Get the discussion started and post below.