Yuliya turns up the temperature
With the final vote in Ukraine's first presidential election since the Orange Revolution just a day or so away, Yuliya Tymoshenko has turned up the political temperature. The provocation was Wednesday's vote to change the election law by supporters of her rival, Viktor Yanukovych. She went straight onto the attack, and claimed it meant "honest elections have come to an end". She then threatened to call people out on the streets in a repeat of the Orange Revolution.
To date, however, it has been Yanukovych's people on the streets (in temperatures as low as -20). Even before the first round of the election, crowds of chanting supporters were massed outside the main government and election buildings. A pop concert on the eve of that first day, in St. Sofiya square, gathered several thousand more, organised like a US Convention from all the regions of Ukraine. The implication was clear - "we may be listening to music now, but we have the numbers". The total number of Party of Regions supporters in Kiev was estimated at between 20,000 and 30,000.
Nobody knows if Tymoshenko could match that. In any case, the demonstrations so far have been mainly made up of party members and people paid to make up the numbers (with rumours of football supporters in reserve). Some ordinary Ukrainians have joined in, but they were not at the organisational core. Unlike the Orange Revolution, any conflict on the streets this time would be part of the post-election chess game, rather than a genuine popular uprising, even if it is made to appear like the latter (and journalists treat it as such).
The mechanics of this street-demo aspect of the election are intriguing. One reason why Yanukovych's supporters voted to dismiss Interior Minister Yuriy Lutsenko a week ago is that he shares responsibility for public order. The other key authority is Kiev's eccentric major Leonid Chernovetsky, widely assumed to be close to the Party of Regions. President Yushchenko has posted Interior Ministry Troops to guard the Central Election Commission building (with questionable authority), but it seems increasingly clear he is working with Yanukovych to stop Tymoshenko at any price.
In fact, one scenario after Sunday's vote is for Yushchenko to connive in a speedy inauguration of Yanukovych in return for his Our Ukraine party playing a big role in a new coalition government with the Party of Regions. Yanukovych could even appoint a business-friendly centrist like Yuriy Yekhanurov as Prime Minister, who previously held the job under Yushchenko in 2005-6. Another name mentioned is Raïsa Bohatyrova, number two on the Party of Regions' list at the last parliamentary elections, but who defected to become Secretary of the National Security Council under Yushchenko. Unfortunately, there are plenty of sharks in the Party of Regions who also want the job.
Tymoshenko has legitimate reasons to complain. But she also seems to be using the spectre of mass fraud to mobilise her supporters, and to prepare a legal case if she loses by a narrow margin.
This places the international community in a bind. Ukraine is not Russia - Ukrainians care about their international standing and a new President elected by subterfuge would not have much power after a Pyrrhic victory.
But the international community is forced to wait and see if there is any mass breach of due process. A lot rests on the judgement of the election monitors from OSCE-ODIHR. They have to tread through a minefield of several as yet unexploded bombs: they must be precise about the level and nature of fraud, but avoid giving ammunition to a highly politicised complaints process; if they are too passive they will be unable to forestall a jump-inauguration process, if they are too active they may help derail an election that for all its faults was basically free and fair.
Once again, the winning margin is the thing to watch. Campaigning is not allowed on Saturday, so I'll be waiting for the first signs of the way the wind is blowing on Sunday before the next post.
Read Andrew's second blog post on Tymoshenko
Listen to his special podcast interview with two eminent Ukrainians, Olexiy Haran and Mykola Ryabchuk, here
For the press...Andrew is available for interviews. Click here for our press advisory.
The latest issue of China Analysis looks at Beijing’s willingness to strengthen international economic governance, and its authors argue that much thinking in China seems to focus on the short term
The authors of the latest issue of China Analysis argue that Western concerns over “Chindia” - the emergence of a Sino-Indian economic power bloc or strategic alliance - may be unwarranted.
Europe has the US president it wished for, but does Barack Obama have the strong transatlantic partner he wants?
Have broken promises and treating Afghanistan, DR Congo and Iraq like Bosnia left the EU without the capacity to prevent fragile states from becoming failing states?
ECFR publishes a collection of views from key Russian intellectuals.
The EU’s ongoing loss of influence at the UN is putting lives at risk, argues the author of ECFR’s latest paper.
Fears in Europe that China works to lock the US into a “G2” embrace so as to dominate the global agenda do not reflect Chinese experts’ current strategic thinking.
Is a complacent strategy that focuses on gradual change rather than crises losing the EU its battle with Russia for influence in the eastern neighbourhood?
The EU has an opportunity to influence President Obama’s efforts to reform US counterterrorism policy
China is exploiting the EU’s divisions and treating the 27-state bloc with “diplomatic contempt” on issues ranging from trade to the Dalai Lama.
Will the military surge in Afghanistan fail without a civilian surge?
With the pivotal change of leadership in Washington, the US and the EU may have an ideal moment to strengthen the US-EU institutional bond.
Could building a single European market in natural gas be the most effective strategy for the European Union in countering Russia’s divisive energy diplomacy?
In a joint research project with FRIDE, ECFR looks at the EU’s record in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Ukraine, Jordan, Lebanon and Morocco.
The EU’s leverage to promote human rights through the UN has dramatically declined over the last decade, our exclusive report reveals.
This authors analyse the background and developments in the Russia-Georgia conflict and outline recommendations on how to prevent wider political fallout.
European governments cannot afford to move at the speed of the slowest, argues Nick Witney, and should push for a ‘multi-speed’ Europe on ESDP
A piece on the EU and Ukraine, quoting Wilson and Popescu’s recent report.
Korski: “The Anglo-American strategy in Afghanistan has hit an absolute low mark.”
Daniel Korski on what lies ahead for Baroness Ashton.
Comments
There are no comments for this entry yet. Get the discussion started and post below.