Higher Turnout May not be Enough to Save Tymoshenko
So the voting at least is over. The polls in Ukraine closed at 8 pm Kiev time, 6 pm in London, 7 pm CET. The exit polls came fast. Surprisingly, the first to be quoted was the ‘National Exit Poll' which was drastically wrong in round one. It puts Yanukovych on 48.7%, Tymoshenko on 45.5% and ‘Against All' at 5.5%. Five other exit polls had a similar message: all put Yanukovych ahead by 3-6%; none put Tymoshenko ahead and none put the gap under 3%. But all put the number ‘against all' between 5% and 6%. Which means the abstainers decided the election; Tymoshenko could have closed the gap with their votes.
Turnout is reported to be up on the first round, maybe over 70%. This might still help Tymoshenko as the real votes are counted; but she really needs turnout to be exceptionally high in the west and centre.
Time will only tell whether this is the worst of all possible results. The real count will take until late tomorrow at least. There is a world of difference between a gap of 5% or 6% and one of less than 3%. Every vote will count. But if the exit polls are right, not because the count will determine who wins; Yanukovych is ahead. But the overnight count will determine whether protest at the result will have a plausible narrative or not. As will the drip feed of stories of voter infringement. This election was conducted with vastly higher standards in round one. Round two was never going to be perfect. Every incident will now be a news story. Judging its true import is still vitally important.
Yanukovych Tymoshenko Against all
National exit poll 48.7% 45.5% 5.5%
Inter/SOCIS 49.6% 44.5% 5.9%
ICTV 49.8% 44.5% 5.9%
Shuster Studio 48.7% 45.6% 5.7%
R&B (not the music) 50.3% 44% 5.5%
Inter/FOM/USS 49.7% 44.6% 5.6%
I'll be back with more analysis on Monday, when we know a little bit more about what the final figures mean. As I've said in previous blogs, whoever looks like slipping behind is unlikely to take any defeat lying down...
Read Andrew's previous blog post on why the loser might bring people onto the streets
Listen to his special podcast interview with two eminent Ukrainians, Olexiy Haran and Mykola Ryabchuk, here
For the press...Andrew is available for interviews. Click here for our press advisory.
This latest edition of “China Analysis” looks at the response to the Copenhagen conference within China itself, as it faces the worst environment position imaginable, threatening its systems and interests.
China is now a huge foreign policy challenge to the EU: it must respond with a global China policy.
Risk of instability in the Western Balkans: the EU can no longer 'wait-and-see'.
The Yanukovych Paradox: How Ukraine’s new president can be good news for Europe after all.
The latest issue of China Analysis looks at Beijing’s willingness to strengthen international economic governance, and its authors argue that much thinking in China seems to focus on the short term
The authors of the latest issue of China Analysis argue that Western concerns over “Chindia” - the emergence of a Sino-Indian economic power bloc or strategic alliance - may be unwarranted.
Europe has the US president it wished for, but does Barack Obama have the strong transatlantic partner he wants?
Have broken promises and treating Afghanistan, DR Congo and Iraq like Bosnia left the EU without the capacity to prevent fragile states from becoming failing states?
ECFR publishes a collection of views from key Russian intellectuals.
The EU’s ongoing loss of influence at the UN is putting lives at risk, argues the author of ECFR’s latest paper.
Andrew Wilson, quoted in a piece about the disappearance of a Ukrainian journalists.
Thomas Klau on France's pension protests.
Jose Ignacio Torreblanca on the significance of ETA's call for a cease-fire.
Comments
There are no comments for this entry yet. Get the discussion started and post below.