"Hard pressed on my right. My centre is giving way. Impossible to manoeuvre. Situation excellent. I attack."
Ferdinand Foch, the pugnacious general credited with stabilising the collapsing French front in 1914, would find much to gratify him in today's Brussels. At the very moment when the Lisbon Treaty was meant, at long last, to be introducing a new dawn of unity and effectiveness in European foreign policy, exactly the reverse seems to be happening.
It is not just the obvious set-backs - the Copenhagen summit debacle, the appointment of two virtual unknowns to the new post-Lisbon leadership roles. Even more worrisome has been the sense of collapsing discipline and cohesion, exemplified by wholly pointless French campaign to undermine Catherine Ashton, and the egregious Spanish effort to ingratiate themselves with the Chinese by hinting at a lifting of the European arms embargo.
And now, to top it all off, the Obama Snub. For such indeed it was - behind all the diplomatic talk of misunderstandings, two unpalatable messages were being conveyed to Europeans.
First, this US Administration is out of patience with a European approach to summit diplomacy which has everything to do with the vanity and domestic political profile of the summiteers, and nothing to do with the efficient conduct of business. The ineptitude of Europe's inflated collective leadership, with everyone crowding into camera shot, was brutally exposed at Copenhagen - and now the US is affirming that it will do what it can to avoid further dealings with it, as long as Europe's national leaders resist the streamlining that Lisbon was meant to bring about.
Second, even an agenda focused on a limited number of topics of particular concern to the US - like Iran - (for this was how the Spanish tried to reshape their summit in an unavailing final effort to save it) is no use if the European side has nothing new or interesting to say about them. An effective EU/US strategic dialogue will take place only when Europeans know their own minds - which will first require them to engage each other in serious discussion of the tough issues such as policy towards Russia, or Afghanistan, and to thrash out their differences as Europeans within the EU, rather than studiously avoiding such questions as at present.
Can Europe's national leaders take these messages to heart? If so, then the gloom that today envelopes Brussels may turn out to be the dark hour before the dawn.
Later this year Europe's new diplomatic service will begin to take shape: Van Rompuy and Ashton, the struggling generals of Europe's common foreign policy, will actually have troops to command. They should draw their inspiration from the rugged Foch, and treat today's disappointments and reverses as preparing the ground for successful counter-attack.
The latest issue of China Analysis looks at Beijing’s willingness to strengthen international economic governance, and its authors argue that much thinking in China seems to focus on the short term
The authors of the latest issue of China Analysis argue that Western concerns over “Chindia” - the emergence of a Sino-Indian economic power bloc or strategic alliance - may be unwarranted.
Europe has the US president it wished for, but does Barack Obama have the strong transatlantic partner he wants?
Have broken promises and treating Afghanistan, DR Congo and Iraq like Bosnia left the EU without the capacity to prevent fragile states from becoming failing states?
ECFR publishes a collection of views from key Russian intellectuals.
The EU’s ongoing loss of influence at the UN is putting lives at risk, argues the author of ECFR’s latest paper.
Fears in Europe that China works to lock the US into a “G2” embrace so as to dominate the global agenda do not reflect Chinese experts’ current strategic thinking.
Is a complacent strategy that focuses on gradual change rather than crises losing the EU its battle with Russia for influence in the eastern neighbourhood?
The EU has an opportunity to influence President Obama’s efforts to reform US counterterrorism policy
China is exploiting the EU’s divisions and treating the 27-state bloc with “diplomatic contempt” on issues ranging from trade to the Dalai Lama.
Will the military surge in Afghanistan fail without a civilian surge?
With the pivotal change of leadership in Washington, the US and the EU may have an ideal moment to strengthen the US-EU institutional bond.
Could building a single European market in natural gas be the most effective strategy for the European Union in countering Russia’s divisive energy diplomacy?
In a joint research project with FRIDE, ECFR looks at the EU’s record in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Ukraine, Jordan, Lebanon and Morocco.
The EU’s leverage to promote human rights through the UN has dramatically declined over the last decade, our exclusive report reveals.
This authors analyse the background and developments in the Russia-Georgia conflict and outline recommendations on how to prevent wider political fallout.
European governments cannot afford to move at the speed of the slowest, argues Nick Witney, and should push for a ‘multi-speed’ Europe on ESDP
A piece on the EU and Ukraine, quoting Wilson and Popescu’s recent report.
Korski: “The Anglo-American strategy in Afghanistan has hit an absolute low mark.”
Daniel Korski on what lies ahead for Baroness Ashton.
Comments
There are no comments for this entry yet. Get the discussion started and post below.