The European Council on Foreign Relations

An open letter to EU leaders

By - 31 Mar 09
A major economic crisis should bring out the best in Europe. The weak should be sheltered by the strong, who in turn should lead the way to a common strategy. But so far Europe is not rising to the occasion by using the crisis to push for common solutions to global problems. Instead, as we approach the G20 summit, the divisions caused by a worsening financial situation are threatening to undermine each of the three big European projects of the last 50 years.

Since 1945, Europe has enjoyed peace and prosperity as never before. The central reason was the creation of Europe's internal market which has locked the economies of different member states together in a legal community that enjoys the free movement of people, capital, goods and services. But if national financial armouries are deployed to boost national industries, with exclusive regard to narrow national economic interests, then the rules of fair competition and the internal market they support will be undermined.

The unfolding financial crisis has convincingly demonstrated the strengths of Europe's second big project, the creation of a common currency. Without it, some members of the Eurozone might have found themselves in far greater difficulty. However, the euro project is revealed as incomplete; it has a central bank but it does not have a central treasury and the supervision of the banking system is left to national authorities.  A lack of solidarity inside the Eurozone, or even with new members of Europe's unified market could become a hazard for the Eurozone.

The third project under pressure is the consolidation of the EU's historic enlargement to the East. The economic vitality of the new member states has benefited the whole Union in recent years.  But now the protectionist statements of some EU leaders, and the unwillingness of some member states to offer financial assistance to Europe's most vulnerable economies, has led some to talk about some old member states wanting to "undo the enlargement". A new tide of populism and nationalism threatens to undermine the EU's core principles of solidarity, tolerance and commitment to open society.

As we look forward to the G20 summit on 2 April, Europe is in a critical position. Its member states are too integrated to be able to develop purely national responses, but too divided to decide on a common way forward. 

It is vital for Europe's leaders to show the vision and leadership to develop a co-ordinated position. It is a time for creative institutional responses at a European level on regulation, on the EU budget, and to encourage temporary and targeted stimuli, for example through a 'Green new Deal'. Leaders should also consider setting up EU Commission-led task-forces to secure and strengthen the single market. They should consider creative ways of underpinning the euro such as Euro-bonds or an EU version of the IMF. Western European leaders must go out of their way to show solidarity with their Eastern counter-parts - including special measures for those struggling to join the Eurozone - rather than the "each for himself" attitude they currently convey. And all well-off countries should explore ways to assist the less developed world against a financial calamity that is not of their own making. We endorse the idea of the IMF issuing Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) with the rich countries lending their allocations to the poorer ones.

The G20 is widely seen as a harbinger of the new global political order. European leaders must show that Europe can contribute in a meaningful way to solving new international problems, rather than parading their internal divisions to the rest of the world. The EU began its life as an economic project designed to achieve political goals. But, as the economic crisis continues, only bold political action at a European level will save the European economy and the European project as a whole. 

Asger Aamund

Martti Ahtisaari

Giuliano Amato

Jan Krzysztof Bielecki

Svetoslav Bojilov

Emma Bonino

Ian Buruma

Manuel Castells

Charles Clarke

Massimo D'Alema

Marta Dassu

Etienne Davignon

Jean-Luc Dehaene

Pavol Demeš

Tibor Dessewffy

Andrew Duff

Sarmite Elerte

Uffe Ellemann-Jensen

Timothy Garton Ash

Teresa Patricio Gouveia

Heather Grabbe

Pierre Hassner

Diego Hidalgo

Michiel Van Hulten

Jaakko Iloniemi

Wolfgang Ischinger

Mary Kaldor

Olli Kivinen

Gerald Knaus

Mark Leonard

Juan Fernando López Aguilar

Nickolay Mladenov

Andrzej Olechowski

Mabel van Oranje

Leoluca Orlando

Cem Özdemir

Ana Palacio

Chris Patten

Diana Pinto

Andrew Puddephatt

George Robertson

Albert Rohan

Dariusz Rosati

Adam D. Rotfeld

Daniel Sachs

Pierre Schori

Giuseppe Scognamiglio

Narcís Serra

Aleksander Smolar

George Soros

Erkki Tuomioja

Antonio Vitorino

Stephen Wall

Andre Wilkens


1 Comments

#1

The EU set out as an economic project. Often criticised for this purely economic agenda, the EU brought about political integration on a globally unprecendented scale. Many pitfalls have yet to be overcome - that is true - but the four freedoms, the Euro, and EU enlargement have benefited every single European citizen.

It is about time that European heads of state start communicating success stories.

In a year of many anniversaries and European elections, it is about time that our political representatives display their determination to continue on the path of peace and prosperity we citzens support.

Thank you for a letter I fully support!

Maximilian Rech

Maximilian Rech | Brussels | 31 Mar 09, 31 Mar 09 EST

Submit a Comment

Your message will be submitted to a moderator before appearing online. Name and email address are required, all other fields are optional. Your email will not be displayed.

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Remember my personal information

Latest Publications

How France and Germany can make Europe work

Hollande and Merkel should launch an ambitious EU reform programme

China and Germany: a new special relationship?

Why the emerging special relationship matters for Europe

China Analysis: Taiwan after the election

How will Taiwan’s relationship with China evolve? 

Jordan: Reform before it’s too late

Europe should take a more assertive approach to political reform in Jordan

China at the crossroads: are the reformers winning the argument?

China is facing a choice between regress and reform

How the EU can support reform in Burma

Europe can help Burma reform, but its help must be gradual

Syria: Towards a Political Solution

An end to the bloodshed may necessitate talks with the regime

The end of the Putin consensus

Putin's return: why Europe should prepare for a weaker Putin

The long shadow of ordoliberalism: Germany's approach to the euro crisis

The thinking behind Germany's unpopular approach to the crisis

European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2012

How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?

China Analysis: Facing the risks of the 'going out strategy'

From a major exporter of goods to a major exporter of capital

Reinvention of Europe

In the Press

Financial Times
18 May 12

Sebastian Dullien's article on the myths surrounding a Greek € exit is mentioned in the…

Rzeczpospolita
17 May 12

Silvia Francescon quoted on G20 significance for Polish daily

New York Times
15 May 12

Thomas Klau quoted on Hollande's visit to Berlin

Le Monde
15 May 12

Le Monde quotes ECFR's Policy Brief on China and Germany new special relationship

Read more press >

Publications side bar