The European Council on Foreign Relations

An open letter to EU leaders

By - 31 Mar 09
A major economic crisis should bring out the best in Europe. The weak should be sheltered by the strong, who in turn should lead the way to a common strategy. But so far Europe is not rising to the occasion by using the crisis to push for common solutions to global problems. Instead, as we approach the G20 summit, the divisions caused by a worsening financial situation are threatening to undermine each of the three big European projects of the last 50 years.

Since 1945, Europe has enjoyed peace and prosperity as never before. The central reason was the creation of Europe's internal market which has locked the economies of different member states together in a legal community that enjoys the free movement of people, capital, goods and services. But if national financial armouries are deployed to boost national industries, with exclusive regard to narrow national economic interests, then the rules of fair competition and the internal market they support will be undermined.

The unfolding financial crisis has convincingly demonstrated the strengths of Europe's second big project, the creation of a common currency. Without it, some members of the Eurozone might have found themselves in far greater difficulty. However, the euro project is revealed as incomplete; it has a central bank but it does not have a central treasury and the supervision of the banking system is left to national authorities.  A lack of solidarity inside the Eurozone, or even with new members of Europe's unified market could become a hazard for the Eurozone.

The third project under pressure is the consolidation of the EU's historic enlargement to the East. The economic vitality of the new member states has benefited the whole Union in recent years.  But now the protectionist statements of some EU leaders, and the unwillingness of some member states to offer financial assistance to Europe's most vulnerable economies, has led some to talk about some old member states wanting to "undo the enlargement". A new tide of populism and nationalism threatens to undermine the EU's core principles of solidarity, tolerance and commitment to open society.

As we look forward to the G20 summit on 2 April, Europe is in a critical position. Its member states are too integrated to be able to develop purely national responses, but too divided to decide on a common way forward. 

It is vital for Europe's leaders to show the vision and leadership to develop a co-ordinated position. It is a time for creative institutional responses at a European level on regulation, on the EU budget, and to encourage temporary and targeted stimuli, for example through a 'Green new Deal'. Leaders should also consider setting up EU Commission-led task-forces to secure and strengthen the single market. They should consider creative ways of underpinning the euro such as Euro-bonds or an EU version of the IMF. Western European leaders must go out of their way to show solidarity with their Eastern counter-parts - including special measures for those struggling to join the Eurozone - rather than the "each for himself" attitude they currently convey. And all well-off countries should explore ways to assist the less developed world against a financial calamity that is not of their own making. We endorse the idea of the IMF issuing Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) with the rich countries lending their allocations to the poorer ones.

The G20 is widely seen as a harbinger of the new global political order. European leaders must show that Europe can contribute in a meaningful way to solving new international problems, rather than parading their internal divisions to the rest of the world. The EU began its life as an economic project designed to achieve political goals. But, as the economic crisis continues, only bold political action at a European level will save the European economy and the European project as a whole. 

Asger Aamund

Martti Ahtisaari

Giuliano Amato

Jan Krzysztof Bielecki

Svetoslav Bojilov

Emma Bonino

Ian Buruma

Manuel Castells

Charles Clarke

Massimo D'Alema

Marta Dassu

Etienne Davignon

Jean-Luc Dehaene

Pavol Demeš

Tibor Dessewffy

Andrew Duff

Sarmite Elerte

Uffe Ellemann-Jensen

Timothy Garton Ash

Teresa Patricio Gouveia

Heather Grabbe

Pierre Hassner

Diego Hidalgo

Michiel Van Hulten

Jaakko Iloniemi

Wolfgang Ischinger

Mary Kaldor

Olli Kivinen

Gerald Knaus

Mark Leonard

Juan Fernando López Aguilar

Nickolay Mladenov

Andrzej Olechowski

Mabel van Oranje

Leoluca Orlando

Cem Özdemir

Ana Palacio

Chris Patten

Diana Pinto

Andrew Puddephatt

George Robertson

Albert Rohan

Dariusz Rosati

Adam D. Rotfeld

Daniel Sachs

Pierre Schori

Giuseppe Scognamiglio

Narcís Serra

Aleksander Smolar

George Soros

Erkki Tuomioja

Antonio Vitorino

Stephen Wall

Andre Wilkens


1 Comments

#1

The EU set out as an economic project. Often criticised for this purely economic agenda, the EU brought about political integration on a globally unprecendented scale. Many pitfalls have yet to be overcome - that is true - but the four freedoms, the Euro, and EU enlargement have benefited every single European citizen.

It is about time that European heads of state start communicating success stories.

In a year of many anniversaries and European elections, it is about time that our political representatives display their determination to continue on the path of peace and prosperity we citzens support.

Thank you for a letter I fully support!

Maximilian Rech

Maximilian Rech | Brussels | 31 Mar 09, 31 Mar 09 EST

Submit a Comment

Your message will be submitted to a moderator before appearing online. Name and email address are required, all other fields are optional. Your email will not be displayed.

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Remember my personal information

Latest Publications

China shapes its post-crisis economic agenda

The latest issue of China Analysis looks at Beijing’s willingness to strengthen international economic governance, and its authors argue that much thinking in China seems to focus on the short term

China and India: rivals always, partners sometimes

The authors of the latest issue of China Analysis argue that Western concerns over “Chindia” - the emergence of a Sino-Indian economic power bloc or strategic alliance - may be unwarranted. 

Towards a post-American Europe: A Power Audit of EU-US Relations by Nick Witney & Jeremy Shapiro

Europe has the US president it wished for, but does Barack Obama have the strong transatlantic partner he wants?

Can the EU rebuild failing states? A review of Europe’s civilian capacities.

Have broken promises and treating Afghanistan, DR Congo and Iraq like Bosnia left the EU without the capacity to prevent fragile states from becoming failing states?

What does Russia think?

ECFR publishes a collection of views from key Russian intellectuals.

The EU and human rights at the UN: 2009 annual review

The EU’s ongoing loss of influence at the UN is putting lives at risk, argues the author of ECFR’s latest paper.

China’s response to the G2

Fears in Europe that China works to lock the US into a “G2” embrace so as to dominate the global agenda do not reflect Chinese experts’ current strategic thinking.

European and Russian power in the troubled neighbourhood

Is a complacent strategy that focuses on gradual change rather than crises losing the EU its battle with Russia for influence in the eastern neighbourhood?

Beyond the “War on Terror”

The EU has an opportunity to influence President Obama’s efforts to reform US counterterrorism policy

A Power Audit of EU-China Relations

China is exploiting the EU’s divisions and treating the 27-state bloc with “diplomatic contempt” on issues ranging from trade to the Dalai Lama.

Shaping Europe's Afghan Surge

Will the military surge in Afghanistan fail without a civilian surge?

Re-wiring the US-EU relationship

With the pivotal change of leadership in Washington, the US and the EU may have an ideal moment to strengthen the US-EU institutional bond.

Beyond dependence: How to deal with Russian gas

Could building a single European market in natural gas be the most effective strategy for the European Union in countering Russia’s divisive energy diplomacy?

Promoting democracy abroad - the EU's record

In a joint research project with FRIDE, ECFR looks at the EU’s record in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Ukraine, Jordan, Lebanon and Morocco.

Is the EU a global force for human rights?

The EU’s leverage to promote human rights through the UN has dramatically declined over the last decade, our exclusive report reveals.

Can the EU win the peace in Georgia?

This authors analyse the background and developments in the Russia-Georgia conflict and outline recommendations on how to prevent wider political fallout.

Re-energising Europe's Security and Defence Policy

European governments cannot afford to move at the speed of the slowest, argues Nick Witney, and should push for a ‘multi-speed’ Europe on ESDP

In the Press

Reuters - 08 Mar 10

Daniel Korski on what lies ahead for Baroness Ashton.

International Herald Tribune - 08 Mar 10

Roger Cohen quotes Nick Witney and Jeremy Shapiro’s transatlantic report.

El Pais - 07 Mar 10

Thomas Klau on Ashton and Lisbon.

The Guardian - 05 Mar 10

Andrew Wilson on Yanukovych’s EU-Russia balancing act.

International Herald Tribune - 05 Mar 10

Thomas Klau: “The Parliament is the biggest immediate beneficiary of the Lisbon Treaty”.…

Read more press >

Click here for ECFR's Youtube channel.