Originally published in The Guardian newspaper, Wednesday, 17 October 2007.
For the third year in a row, Turkey's annual hurdles on the winding path of convergence with the EU - a progress report early next month and the European Council in December - are likely to be bruising. Doubters will seize on gridlock over Cyprus and a pause in legislative reform to allege that Turkey is not changing and should be pushed back outside the EU's gates. They will point to Ankara's response to US efforts to declare the 1915-23 killing of Armenians a genocide, and the political push for an incursion into northern Iraq to deal with cross-border terrorist attacks, as evidence that Turkey is not ready to join the club. So it is worth stepping back and considering why Europe needs Turkey.
Turkey was critical to Europe in the cold war. For 40 years, it stood lonely guard on the south-eastern third of Nato's frontline, paying the price in military-heavy government and delayed development. There was little carping about its Muslim identity then, and a cultural variety that included Turkey was considered a European strength. After communism's collapse, Turkey kept contributing to Europe's security, giving troops and legitimacy to EU-backed missions in Afghanistan, Lebanon, the Balkans, and even Congo. If EU-Turkish relations had not stumbled (for which all sides are responsible), it would likely be supporting a force for Darfur.
Click here to read the full article.
This latest edition of “China Analysis” looks at the response to the Copenhagen conference within China itself, as it faces the worst environment position imaginable, threatening its systems and interests.
China is now a huge foreign policy challenge to the EU: it must respond with a global China policy.
Risk of instability in the Western Balkans: the EU can no longer 'wait-and-see'.
The Yanukovych Paradox: How Ukraine’s new president can be good news for Europe after all.
The latest issue of China Analysis looks at Beijing’s willingness to strengthen international economic governance, and its authors argue that much thinking in China seems to focus on the short term
The authors of the latest issue of China Analysis argue that Western concerns over “Chindia” - the emergence of a Sino-Indian economic power bloc or strategic alliance - may be unwarranted.
Europe has the US president it wished for, but does Barack Obama have the strong transatlantic partner he wants?
Have broken promises and treating Afghanistan, DR Congo and Iraq like Bosnia left the EU without the capacity to prevent fragile states from becoming failing states?
ECFR publishes a collection of views from key Russian intellectuals.
The EU’s ongoing loss of influence at the UN is putting lives at risk, argues the author of ECFR’s latest paper.
Andrew Wilson, quoted in a piece about the disappearance of a Ukrainian journalists.
Thomas Klau on France's pension protests.
Jose Ignacio Torreblanca on the significance of ETA's call for a cease-fire.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Now that Turkey is about to invade Kurdi Iraq, should the EU be more pro-active in security terms?
The Turkish government is trying to presents its reasons for the invasion as ones similar to U.S. preventive attack on Iraq. But this time, this time there is definitely no WMD in Kurdi Iraq!
By the Turkish government’s logic, and state could attack another state for preventive reasons. This is a huge destabilizing blow at the current international security system.
Andy Ignatov,
http://www.activist.org.ua
One things is being an ally. Another thing is being a member. Turkey is a solid ally, but would it be a good member?
It doesn’t share many of EU’s basic values, it has opposing views on some historical and social issues (Armenian question, recognized as genocide by the EU, taboo in Turkey) that forecast future problems on key foreign policy problems.
The ecfr advocates stronger EU’s unity… which can’t be reached if Turkey is admitted due to its many important differences. First create a real bond between EU countries. Then you will have a standard Turkey will have to ADAPT to to be allowed in.
The feeling is that ecfr is really too rigid on this point that is also the exact contrary of everything else it proposes. Do you want EU unity? Or do you want Turkey as a member? Because speaking is easy, but in practical terms, at the moment, the two things exclude each other.