After weeks of horse-trading for candidates for the two future top EU
positions, the new President and the new Foreign Minister, the two names,
Hermann van Rompuy and Cathy Ashton, have provoked European-wide bafflement.
Years to get an important new treaty, intended to allow
But van Rompuy and Ashton might actually be good choices. Yes, they are
unknown and do not convey strong opinions or visions for
Cathy Ashton may not know much about the Middle East or
History shows that the world produces and gets the people it needs. There is
no doubt that
This latest edition of “China Analysis” looks at the response to the Copenhagen conference within China itself, as it faces the worst environment position imaginable, threatening its systems and interests.
China is now a huge foreign policy challenge to the EU: it must respond with a global China policy.
Risk of instability in the Western Balkans: the EU can no longer 'wait-and-see'.
The Yanukovych Paradox: How Ukraine’s new president can be good news for Europe after all.
The latest issue of China Analysis looks at Beijing’s willingness to strengthen international economic governance, and its authors argue that much thinking in China seems to focus on the short term
The authors of the latest issue of China Analysis argue that Western concerns over “Chindia” - the emergence of a Sino-Indian economic power bloc or strategic alliance - may be unwarranted.
Europe has the US president it wished for, but does Barack Obama have the strong transatlantic partner he wants?
Have broken promises and treating Afghanistan, DR Congo and Iraq like Bosnia left the EU without the capacity to prevent fragile states from becoming failing states?
ECFR publishes a collection of views from key Russian intellectuals.
The EU’s ongoing loss of influence at the UN is putting lives at risk, argues the author of ECFR’s latest paper.
Thomas Klau on Germany’s linchpin role in the eurozone governance debate.
Ulrike Guerot on Germany's place in Europe, post euro crisis.
Andrew Wilson says Ukraine's greatest success has been its 'survival'.
2 Comments
Dear Madam,
I am afraid you comment is a very good example of an apologetic approach to European affairs process which, in my opinion, very often taints the field of European integration studies. Yes, the choice of Mr. van Rompuy and Ms. Ashton can be interpreted as a result of underlying structural factors, and it does probably convey a fairly realistic picture of the ‘state of the (European) Union’.
However, none of these findings should obscure the fact that our European leaders had an excellent chance to push things forward and make some intelligent use of the opportunites provided by the Lisbon Treaty… and they failed.
What the European Union needed was not necessarily Tony Blair, nor should political “sex appeal” be a determining requirement for the jobs of the European Council chair and the new EU “foreign minister”. But what the EU certainly needs are political leaders who command respect - both outside Europe but, equally importantly, within. If the EU is to be here not just for its member states but also for the people, it must have representatives to whom the European citizens can relate. And that, I am afraid, is not the case with either of the two selected candidates. That’s why, in this respect as in many others, the choice the European Council made yesterday is a bad one.
Sincerely,
Tomas Karasek
Dear Ulrike Guerot,
its far-sighted to balance the views about 2 new European leaders. In fact history has proved that so called “Nobodys” (see SPIEGEL ONLINE about the new leadership) contribute in signifcant ways. Not only for europe last decades…
Nurturing important consensus building procedere in a highly complex European situation -within a global context! -can be an asset.
Thank you for this special take here at ECFR and thank you for your work at the Berlin Bureau in special.
Very best, from Berlin
Albert Klamt