The European Council on Foreign Relations

Côte d’Ivoire: Where’s Europe?

Tensions are still perilously high in Côte d’Ivoire over a week after both sitting President Laurent Gbagbo and his rival Alassane Ouattara both claimed victory in national elections. The US, UN, African Union and ECOWAS have sided with Mr Ouattara, but he is now holed up in a hotel in the capital Abidjan, threatened by Gbagbo’s loyalists.

Ouattara’s guards include some of the UN peacekeepers who have patrolled Côte d’Ivoire since 2004.  In New York, UN diplomats have engaged in frenetic talks on the crisis.  Not all had seen it coming: “We didn’t believe Gbagbo would permit elections until he was sure he was going to win them,” laughs one official.  Now the main question is whether the UN troops will stand and fight if Gbagbo’s goons decide to storm Ouattara’s hotel.

The crisis has been a rich seam of gossip. Why did Russia initially block a Security Council statement in support of Ouattara? Diplomats wonder whether Moscow has some commercial interest in Gbagbo’s rule. And is it true that Thabo Mbeki, the former South African president sent to mediate, promised Gbagbo millions of dollars if he conceded?

Amid all this chatter, something is missing. It is European power.  France – the former colonial power - has been active in diplomacy in New York.  But officials with long memories recall how the French used to behave in Côte d’Ivoire. In 2004, after Ivorian planes attacked French peacekeepers, France destroyed the country’s (small) airforce.

Today, there are still French troops in Côte d’Ivoire, but in smaller numbers than 2004.  There have been concerns that a tough line from Paris would lead to violence against French civilians, especially after the Gbagbo camp called Ouattara a French stooge. 

The EU had sent monitors to cover the polls, although their operations were marred by death threats. This week, the EU agreed targeted sanctions against Gbagbo’s henchmen and called on him to step down - but the AU, ECOWAS and US are leading on the crisis.

The very fact that Thabo Mbeki is the main mediator is a sign of the times. France has traditionally resisted South African influence in West Africa. Jacques Chirac once told Mr Mbeki that he needed to “understand the soul of West Africa”.  “I would really like President Mbeki to immerse himself in West Africa so as to understand the mentality and the soul of West Africa,” the then President of the Republic noted, “because in times of crisis, you have to really know people's mentalities and what is in people's souls.”

Mbeki probably thought of those words as he flew into Côte d’Ivoire this month.  He may have mused on how France – like Europe more generally – has lost influence in Africa.

2 comments

Tobias Koepf 15th December 2010 at 05:12am

Dear Richard,

Thanks a lot for that comment on Cote d’Ivoire! Still, I think it’s a bit puzzling, because on the one hand you (rightly) point out that France, due to its colonial legacy and its controversial role in November 2004, is ill-suited to play a more active role in mediating the conflict. On the other hand, you regret that the EU is not leading on the crisis. But can you really imagine a stronger EU role with Paris accepting the back seat? I can’t…

I think that Laurent Gbagbo would try to make look any European attempt to become a player in managing the crisis like another French effort to reconquer its famous West African ‘vitrine’, as he had done several times before. Thus, in my view it is rather a positive development that France and the EU are cautious in becoming engaged in conflict management and leave the main responsibility to the the UN, the AU and ECOWAS, the latter having probably the largest impact on the countries in the region. Of course, this is no guarantee for success (and one can only hope that the showdown on Thursday will not end in bloodshed), but probably the best option one can get at the moment.

Best,

Tobias

Richard Gowan 16th December 2010 at 02:12am

Thanks for these thoughts, Tobias.

I fully agree that any EU action requires French leadership… Here’s an interesting question.  Is Chad (where the EU intervened at France’s behest, effectively propping up the less-than-inspiring Idriss Deby) better off than Cote d’Ivoire (where the EU is hanging back and democracy may actually run its course)?

Submit a comment

Your message will be submitted to a moderator before appearing online. Name and email address are required, all other fields are optional. Your email will not be displayed.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Remember my personal information

Random Posts


Latest Publications

The continent-wide rise of Euroscepticism

Europeans are losing faith in the EU

Europe and the vanishing two-state solution

Europe can rescue the two-state solution

Europe’s strategic cacophony

27 countries in search of a proper security strategy

What does the Gulf think about the Arab Awakening?

Understanding the influence of the Gulf States

Georgia’s bumpy transition: How the EU can help

A new era for EU-Georgia relations?

The struggle for pluralism after the North African revolutions

What next for Egypt, Tunisia and Libya?

China Analysis: Shockwaves from the China/Japan island dispute

What does China think about the island dispute?

European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2013

A comprehensive evaluation of European foreign policy

The new political geography of Europe

How the euro crisis has affected politics in 14 EU member states