The European Council on Foreign Relations

Cairo diary: Will Egypt help in Libya?

Nothing would help the international campaign against Colonel Gaddafi as much as the Egyptian military — and therefore Egypt — swinging in behind the UN-authorised effort. It would be one of the few things that would make the Libyan dictator worry and could push fence-sitting loyalists towards the rebel cause.

Materially, it could also be important; with the Libyan resistance reluctant to receive Nato help, Egypt could be very helpful as a conduit for weapons, intelligence and even on-the-ground military support. A post-combat mission would also be greatly aided by Egyptian involvement or leadership.

Unfortunately, after a few days in Cairo, I think it is more likely that Colonel Gaddafi will turn himself in than Field Marshal Tantawi, Egypt's de facto ruler, will send his army into neighbouring Libya. There are four main reasons why:

1) Many in the army seem to think that what is going on in Libya could happen in Egypt — that is, it may be necessary to quash a rebellion. Better, in their view, then, not to get involved in Libya.

2) The army actually appears to be afraid of having to work with others, especially the West, for fear of being showed up. Fewer than 20 percent of Egypt's jets are said to be air-worthy. The reputational risks of taking part in the Libya intervention, under the glare of Nato and the world's media, are simply too great for an army already under increased scrutiny.

3) Then there is the loathing of Nato. Just because Nicolas Sarkozy believes something does not make it wrong: in fact, he was right to think that Nato would struggle to convince Arab states — and, in particular, the Egyptian military — to support the coalition.

4) Finally, there is the army's work in Egypt. After the revolution, the Egyptian police have partly disappeared, leaving the army to direct traffic, protect embassies and undertake a myriad of other duties. They have, in other words, their hands full at home.

This means that the Egyptian army will likely "sit out" the Libyan intervention, almost regardless of what it is offered as an incentive, and the British government will have to focus on working with other Arab states — like Morocco, Jordan and Oman — to liaise with the Libyan rebels and manage any post-combat mission.

Daniel is on an ECFR research visit to Cairo with other ECFR colleagues. The blog of his visit is appearing on The Spectator's Coffeehouse blog.

 

Be the first to comment

Submit a comment

Your message will be submitted to a moderator before appearing online. Name and email address are required, all other fields are optional. Your email will not be displayed.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Remember my personal information

Random Posts

Latest Publications

How France and Germany can make Europe work

Hollande and Merkel should launch an ambitious EU reform programme

China and Germany: a new special relationship?

Why the emerging special relationship matters for Europe

China Analysis: Taiwan after the election

How will Taiwan’s relationship with China evolve? 

Jordan: Reform before it’s too late

Europe should take a more assertive approach to political reform in Jordan

China at the crossroads: are the reformers winning the argument?

China is facing a choice between regress and reform

How the EU can support reform in Burma

Europe can help Burma reform, but its help must be gradual

Syria: Towards a Political Solution

An end to the bloodshed may necessitate talks with the regime

The end of the Putin consensus

Putin's return: why Europe should prepare for a weaker Putin

The long shadow of ordoliberalism: Germany's approach to the euro crisis

The thinking behind Germany's unpopular approach to the crisis

European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2012

How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?