The European Council on Foreign Relations

Go to the Madrid office's page

Go to the Madrid office's blog in Spanish

Madrid view: is the worst over for Spain in 2013?

 

How does 2013 look for Spain? Is the worst over? The answer to that question depends largely on how “worst” is defined.

The absolute worst scenario, the collapse of the euro, can now be set aside thanks to the decisive action of European Central Bank president Mario Draghi. The wording he chose in a statement on the issue – “I will do whatever it takes to save the euro and, believe me, it will be sufficient” – was exactly what the markets had been waiting for since 2010. Markets now know that betting against the euro could be dangerous.

But this does not mean that the crisis is fully over.

For domestic political reasons, EU leaders are still reluctant to follow Draghi’s lead and do whatever it takes to consolidate the euro. A banking union has been born, but it is still half-baked, while the more ambitious proposals aimed at a fiscal union are still in their infancy. EU

Read more…

Madrid view: A British Europe

Returning from London I am still stunned by the growing intensity of the Europhobe-Europhile debate. The EU is a corrupt, undemocratic entity that is robbing us, say some in the heat of the budget debate. If we leave the EU, say others, we'll become a kind of Singapore. Indeed, in the cold light of day there can be little reason for surprise at the raw nature of this battle. The British are now headed for two referendums that will clarify questions of particular importance: is Scotland to remain in the UK, and the UK in the EU? If a country's national identity hinges on questions about who we are, what we want, and with whom we are to achieve it, then two principal anchorages of any state are being called into question here.

We often hear that this debate shows the low degree of Europeanization in the UK, which entered the EU reluctantly, as the result of a chain of internal and

2 commentsRead more…

The faces of a post-Putin future?

“Russia has no future.” Last autumn you heard this repeated like a mantra in Moscow. “We have no future.” Putin’s capital talked this way because everyone interested in politics had done the same thing on September 24th 2011. The day of the United Russia party congress that the “national leader” announced he would return to the Kremlin. Everyone interested in politics had calculated how old they would be in 2024. The year that constitutionally Putin would have to leave the President’s post. That moment etched itself into the memory of a generation. It seemed only to mean one thing – Putin had a monopoly on the future.

Then the unexpected occurred. The Moscow protest movement suddenly flared and even if it did not break, or really dent, Putin’s grip over the Duma, the bureaucracy, the oil, the gas or the FSB, it cost him that monopoly on tomorrow. It exposed that he was not in

1 commentsRead more…

Madrid View: I want my money

 

How can it be that amid the crisis, with cutbacks and austerity in every state, the European Commission has proposed a budget for 2014-2020, which increases EU spending by no less than five percent? In this context, shouldn't the EU also tighten its belt, especially given that its resources come from the budgets of the member states, by direct contributions, and from the citizens, by way of VAT. Would it not make more sense to freeze or even reduce the EU budget, now amounting to 942 billion euros, instead of raising it to 1.09 trillion, as the Commission is proposing?
 
One would be tempted to agree with this, were it not exactly the line taken by the government of David Cameron, who has demanded a freeze on the budget in real terms. According to the British Treasury, this means lowering the spending ceiling to 886 billion euros. Once again, London’s diplomatic spirit shines

1 commentsRead more…

Madrid view: After the battle

The re-election of Barack Obama is one more battle in the long war that the left and the right have been waging for three decades, over the role of the state. In duration and geography, and intensity, it calls to mind the Thirty Years’War, which lasted from 1618 to 1648. Then the conflict was about territory, religion and dynastic succession. Nowadays the battle is about rather more post-modern issues: the limits of the state and the market, the tension between freedom and equality, and the setting of frontiers not between territories, but between social classes.

This 30-year pseudo-war, in the analogy drawn by Bill Clinton to dramatize the virulence it is attaining in the US, began with the victories of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan in 1979 and 1980, a turning point in the view of the state. While, until then, both American conservatives and European social democrats not too

Read more…

Page 3 of 10 pages  < 1 2 3 4 5 >  Last ›


Latest Publications

The continent-wide rise of Euroscepticism

Europeans are losing faith in the EU

Europe and the vanishing two-state solution

Europe can rescue the two-state solution

Europe’s strategic cacophony

27 countries in search of a proper security strategy

What does the Gulf think about the Arab Awakening?

Understanding the influence of the Gulf States

Georgia’s bumpy transition: How the EU can help

A new era for EU-Georgia relations?

The struggle for pluralism after the North African revolutions

What next for Egypt, Tunisia and Libya?

China Analysis: Shockwaves from the China/Japan island dispute

What does China think about the island dispute?

European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2013

A comprehensive evaluation of European foreign policy

The new political geography of Europe

How the euro crisis has affected politics in 14 EU member states